Apple Just Told Me It's Normal For My Macbook Pro Retina To
Underperform, And Completely Safe For My
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
my computer, 2013 mbpr 15" 2.3ghz, has had persistent issue undervolting cpu , gpu when temperatures hit between 95° , 100° c. , as normal, , expected of motherboard when determining temps of components high, remain unsatisfied cannot saturate cpu , gpu while retaining clock speeds advertised apple itself.
so, having had similar issue previous macbook pro, , having fixed replacing thermal paste myself, brought computer in apple store done. dismissed uninformed , paranoid under argument there no issue. “genius”, admitting not understanding issue presenting, ran diagnostics available him, told him computer running fine. computer not malfunctioning. of course isn’t — system throttling internals ensure doesn’t malfunction. , throttling core function of machine. nothing “wrong” machine because logic board scales voltage prevent being wrong. in other words, computer designed underperform due quality of cooling system available it.
when escalated issue “lead genius,” told unequivocally cpu can run comfortably @ 120° c. , there no issue. both apple tech support , intel tech support later clarified can, perhaps, hit 120° incredibly brief period, instability expected @ 100° , higher. should mention asked if meant “degrees or celsius” when referencing temps, , told 120° c < 200° f……
understand have responsibility provide computer best opportunity work efficiently can. provided keep computer in chilled environment, well-vented, , clean, there no reason me not able leverage full base power of both cpu , gpu, , can’t. gpu clock speed drops 925 mhz low point of ~600 mhz. cpu dip low 1.5 ghz when hits 100° c, , climb, dip; rinse , repeat.
if conforming apple’s specifications regarding optimal environment thing work advertised, should work advertised. when have fight tooth , nail apple recognize not computer performing sub-optimally on consistent basis, such issue not okay $2200 machine, have problem.
know macs run hot. what’s par course shouldn’t define gold standard. , in truth, don’t care how hot computer gets. care performance promised.
hi,
sorry, confused, you're looking then? if it's normal, expected, and its reality, how become satisfied?
os x el capitan (10.11) on unsupported macs macos extractor , macpostfactor apps guide through patching , installing os x el capitan (10.11), yosemite (10.10), mavericks (10.9), or mountain lion (10.8) on older mac. thread focuses on os x el capitan. macpostfactor works mountain lion, mavericks, yosemite, , el capitan. please note older gpu (gma 950, x3100, x1600, x1300, x1900, 7300gt, etc.) graphics acceleration on mavericks, yosemite, , el capitan not supported yet. installing on these models may cause them have graphical issues stated in these pages. kexts provided little bit. macos extractor more advanced users , should only used alternative macpostfactor. thread consists of members prominent in these patches can solve issues. please not hesitate post if have questions. apple history os x 10.6 snow leopard first os x version optional support 64-bit kernel, allowing booting either 32-bit or 64-bit kernel. however, apple did not support...
can installed 10.11 please run geekbench? 2861 single-core score 5989 multi-core score Forums Macs macOS OS X El Capitan (10.11) iPhone Mac OS & System Software iPad Apple Watch Notebooks iTunes Apple ID iCloud Desktop Computers Apple Music Professional Applications iPod iWork Apple TV iLife Wireless
i'm getting first mac laptop, work i'll heavily use personally. work exclusively office 365 apps, web, , basic network stuff ssh. personal use, use photoshop , scrivener, , light video editing (family stuff). use laptop portable media player when traveling. may add games, turn-based 4x games (civilization, etc.) not super graphic-intense stuff. should add have powerful desktop tons of storage already, not system. have hard, non-negotiable budget of $2500 must include applecare ($249 13", $349 15"). i'm considering 2 configs: 13" macbook pro w/3.1ghz dual core i5, 16gb ram, 512gb flash ($2448 w/ac) or 15" macbook pro w/2.5ghz quad core i7, 16gb ram, 256gb flash ($2488 w/ac) comes down 15" having faster procs less storage, while 13" has more storage slower procs. i'm leaning 15" assumption 256gb ought enough , can plug in thunderbolt add-on hard drive...right? there ways more storage ,...
Comments
Post a Comment