Photos App - Disorganized Albums and All Photos...


so in albums section, former iphoto events there, out of form of logical order (date, name, etc). iphoto had nicely done organized date whether newest top or bottom, worked nice.

in albums tab - photos...well thats biggest mess i've ever seen. in aperture , iphoto displayed date or name, can see no way of organizing photos date or title or there either...

ideas?


inquiry...how know high-resolution photos being imported?
 

you have 1 sort option albums: in sidebar, right-click/control-click on albums heading, album, or folder - you'll have sort name option. sort folders , albums @ level, not change sort order of nested folders. it's worth, when sort name not selected, things organized in aperture library.

sorting images within photos... it's worth, photos is sorted date. how opened after converting aperture library.

view menu has "keep sorted date/keep sorted date added." when i'm viewing photos, option checked , grayed-out. however, sake of experiment, have been able select when first open photos (before images render), , alternate sort order between date added , 'totally jumbled' (i haven't figured out why they're totally jumbled). however, regardless of way it's sorted, keep sorted date added still has check-mark.

clarify, sort name changes sort order of folders , albums in sidebar, keep sorted date changes sort order of images within album.

i'd consider of fall category of bug.

whether high-resolution version being imported? open info window (window drop-down menu > info or command + i). you'll see image dimensions in pixels (eg. 3456 x 4608), file size, , file type.
 


Forums Macs Mac Apps and Mac App Store


  • iPhone
  • Mac OS & System Software
  • iPad
  • Apple Watch
  • Notebooks
  • iTunes
  • Apple ID
  • iCloud
  • Desktop Computers
  • Apple Music
  • Professional Applications
  • iPod
  • iWork
  • Apple TV
  • iLife
  • Wireless

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

OS X El Capitan on Unsupported Macs

Image
os x el capitan (10.11) on unsupported macs macos extractor , macpostfactor apps guide through patching , installing os x el capitan (10.11), yosemite (10.10), mavericks (10.9), or mountain lion (10.8) on older mac. thread focuses on os x el capitan. macpostfactor works mountain lion, mavericks, yosemite, , el capitan. please note older gpu (gma 950, x3100, x1600, x1300, x1900, 7300gt, etc.) graphics acceleration on mavericks, yosemite, , el capitan not supported yet. installing on these models may cause them have graphical issues stated in these pages. kexts provided little bit. macos extractor more advanced users , should only used alternative macpostfactor. thread consists of members prominent in these patches can solve issues. please not hesitate post if have questions. ​ apple history os x 10.6 snow leopard first os x version optional support 64-bit kernel, allowing booting either 32-bit or 64-bit kernel. however, apple did not support...
Read more

Performance boost?

can installed 10.11 please run geekbench?   2861 single-core score 5989 multi-core score   Forums Macs macOS OS X El Capitan (10.11) iPhone Mac OS & System Software iPad Apple Watch Notebooks iTunes Apple ID iCloud Desktop Computers Apple Music Professional Applications iPod iWork Apple TV iLife Wireless
Read more

Which Macbook Pro to Get?

Image
i'm getting first mac laptop, work i'll heavily use personally. work exclusively office 365 apps, web, , basic network stuff ssh. personal use, use photoshop , scrivener, , light video editing (family stuff). use laptop portable media player when traveling. may add games, turn-based 4x games (civilization, etc.) not super graphic-intense stuff. should add have powerful desktop tons of storage already, not system. have hard, non-negotiable budget of $2500 must include applecare ($249 13", $349 15"). i'm considering 2 configs: 13" macbook pro w/3.1ghz dual core i5, 16gb ram, 512gb flash ($2448 w/ac) or 15" macbook pro w/2.5ghz quad core i7, 16gb ram, 256gb flash ($2488 w/ac) comes down 15" having faster procs less storage, while 13" has more storage slower procs. i'm leaning 15" assumption 256gb ought enough , can plug in thunderbolt add-on hard drive...right? there ways more storage ,...
Read more