Heart rate monitor question


i see lots of people mentioning low values...has had explained high values 200 bpm? have gotten 2 random measurements , measurement before , after normal. think notice if hr 200 bpm right? or need call doc now....
 

i don't far off - , things fine. negative experiences can divided 2 categories.

first happened once. cycling , pushing hill. hr 144. backed off, though still going uphill , not steep. after 20 seconds of this, checked hr , said 76 ! no way low. after seconds, got more rational numbers. 1 time error other checks when exercising seem logical.

other when doing normal heart check. watch checks every 10 minutes, if go glance hr, first show results of it's last check , tell how long ago (1-10 minutes, guess). start calculating present hr.

here's thing. know many prior tests if i'm sitting awhile or lying down, resting hr going in 50's (sometimes upper 40's.

quite few times hr gives me x minutes ago above - in 80's , once, when woke in morning, said 107 !!!

, calculates present rate , in 50's again. never has given me surprising number fresh calculation , when earlier calculation doesn't seem correct, high.

maybe, sake of research, others check figures sometimes. easy enough do, results more meaningful if know numbers should be. , checking when rested easier evaluate rather after exerting yourself.

might no related issue, maybe is.
 


Forums Apple Watch Apple Watch Apps


  • iPhone
  • Mac OS & System Software
  • iPad
  • Apple Watch
  • Notebooks
  • iTunes
  • Apple ID
  • iCloud
  • Desktop Computers
  • Apple Music
  • Professional Applications
  • iPod
  • iWork
  • Apple TV
  • iLife
  • Wireless

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

OS X El Capitan on Unsupported Macs

Image
os x el capitan (10.11) on unsupported macs macos extractor , macpostfactor apps guide through patching , installing os x el capitan (10.11), yosemite (10.10), mavericks (10.9), or mountain lion (10.8) on older mac. thread focuses on os x el capitan. macpostfactor works mountain lion, mavericks, yosemite, , el capitan. please note older gpu (gma 950, x3100, x1600, x1300, x1900, 7300gt, etc.) graphics acceleration on mavericks, yosemite, , el capitan not supported yet. installing on these models may cause them have graphical issues stated in these pages. kexts provided little bit. macos extractor more advanced users , should only used alternative macpostfactor. thread consists of members prominent in these patches can solve issues. please not hesitate post if have questions. ​ apple history os x 10.6 snow leopard first os x version optional support 64-bit kernel, allowing booting either 32-bit or 64-bit kernel. however, apple did not support...
Read more

Performance boost?

can installed 10.11 please run geekbench?   2861 single-core score 5989 multi-core score   Forums Macs macOS OS X El Capitan (10.11) iPhone Mac OS & System Software iPad Apple Watch Notebooks iTunes Apple ID iCloud Desktop Computers Apple Music Professional Applications iPod iWork Apple TV iLife Wireless
Read more

Which Macbook Pro to Get?

Image
i'm getting first mac laptop, work i'll heavily use personally. work exclusively office 365 apps, web, , basic network stuff ssh. personal use, use photoshop , scrivener, , light video editing (family stuff). use laptop portable media player when traveling. may add games, turn-based 4x games (civilization, etc.) not super graphic-intense stuff. should add have powerful desktop tons of storage already, not system. have hard, non-negotiable budget of $2500 must include applecare ($249 13", $349 15"). i'm considering 2 configs: 13" macbook pro w/3.1ghz dual core i5, 16gb ram, 512gb flash ($2448 w/ac) or 15" macbook pro w/2.5ghz quad core i7, 16gb ram, 256gb flash ($2488 w/ac) comes down 15" having faster procs less storage, while 13" has more storage slower procs. i'm leaning 15" assumption 256gb ought enough , can plug in thunderbolt add-on hard drive...right? there ways more storage ,...
Read more